Comments on: Healthcare Regulations are Killing Your Practice http://www.drzachary.net/2010/01/15/845/ Christopher Zachary MD is a speicalist in laser surgery, aesthetic surgery, and cancer (Mohs Micrographic Surgery) and reconstructive surgery Wed, 21 Dec 2011 15:57:09 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: CBZ http://www.drzachary.net/2010/01/15/845/comment-page-1/#comment-2044 CBZ Sun, 20 Feb 2011 00:01:07 +0000 http://www.drzachary.net/?p=845#comment-2044 You're right! You’re right!

]]> By: Darlene http://www.drzachary.net/2010/01/15/845/comment-page-1/#comment-2035 Darlene Sat, 11 Dec 2010 23:51:09 +0000 http://www.drzachary.net/?p=845#comment-2035 Wouldn't the Public Option have made it all work well and cost effectively as it seems to do in other countries? Seems the problem is the just pass something to have something to later improve on plan is what did the damage? Can we, in this climate of propaganda and demands of austerity for all but the top 5% hope to correct this, rather than toss the baby with the bathwater, so that more get access to care and it's done with efficiency? What i don't understand is what we have now, half baked though it may be, can be used to save money and it's not being done. If all parents who could afford it cover their disabled children with disabilities to age 26 and maybe some could even take them off the dole, much fed state and local $ would be saved. The states need to create programs so many parents can use the to age 26 private coverage at universities instead of state supplemented student health fees to lower student health care costs and state burden. With some more thought, and agency cooperation, other ideas could work to use what we've got more effectively too. Maybe UCI should start a non-partisan think tank to develop some of these ideas. Wouldn’t the Public Option have made it all work well and cost effectively as it seems to do in other countries? Seems the problem is the just pass something to have something to later improve on plan is what did the damage?

Can we, in this climate of propaganda and demands of austerity for all but the top 5% hope to correct this, rather than toss the baby with the bathwater, so that more get access to care and it’s done with efficiency?

What i don’t understand is what we have now, half baked though it may be, can be used to save money and it’s not being done.
If all parents who could afford it cover their disabled children with disabilities to age 26 and maybe some could even take them off the dole, much fed state and local $ would be saved.

The states need to create programs so many parents can use the to age 26 private coverage at universities instead of state supplemented student health fees to lower student health care costs and state burden.

With some more thought, and agency cooperation, other ideas could work to use what we’ve got more effectively too.

Maybe UCI should start a non-partisan think tank to develop some of these ideas.

]]>